Vestige of the Noon Light by Umme Roman.
1. What was the initial spark or inspiration for this specific still life?
The initial spark for this piece was a fascination with the concept of quietude in a world that often feels relentlessly loud and saturated. I found myself staring at a small corner of my kitchen where the late afternoon light hit a bowl of fruit, and I realized that in that fleeting moment, the objects had ceased to be mere food. They had become a geometric landscape of shadows and highlights. I wanted to capture the dignity of the mundane; the way a simple banana or a cluster of grapes can command space if we only slow down enough to notice.
Inspiration often comes from this desire to pause time. In our digital age, we consume images at a frantic pace; I wanted to create something that required the opposite: a slow, meditative gaze. This piece was born from a need to strip away the distractions of color and noise to find the skeletal truth of the objects. It wasn't about the fruit itself, but about the relationship between light and dark, and how a heavy shadow can make a physical object feel both anchored and ethereal at the same time. The spark was the silence of the room.
2. Why did you choose these specific fruits as your subjects?
I chose bananas, grapes, and citrus because they represent a perfect triad of textures and mathematical forms. The banana provides a necessary verticality and a structural, architectural quality that breaks the horizon. Its skin is thick and matte, absorbing light differently than the others. The grapes offer a rhythmic repetition; small, clustered spheres that create a sense of abundance and intricate detail. Finally, the citrus fruits provide the foundational weight; their spherical nature is a classic trope in art because it allows for the most dramatic exploration of the core shadow and the specular highlight.
Beyond the geometry, there is a symbolic weight to these choices. These are humble fruits, staples of the domestic landscape that are often overlooked until they are gone. By elevating them into a formal composition, I am asking the viewer to reconsider the value of the everyday. The curve of the banana echoes a human gesture, perhaps a slouch or a bow, while the grapes feel like a crowd or a community. They were chosen not for their sweetness, but for their ability to hold the light and tell a story of shape and shadow.
3. Is there a personal memory or domestic ritual associated with these objects?
These objects are deeply tied to the ritual of the Sunday Reset; that quiet, often lonely time in the kitchen when the week’s groceries are unpacked and arranged. For me, the act of placing fruit in a bowl is one of the few domestic tasks that feels like an unconscious art form. I remember my grandmother doing the same; she had a specific, almost sacred way of arranging things so that the most beautiful side faced the room. To her, it wasn't about aesthetics, but about care and providing a sense of order in a chaotic world.
Painting these fruits felt like an extension of that ritual. It is a domestic prayer of sorts; an acknowledgment of the sustenance that keeps us alive and the small beauties that make that life worth living. Every time I see a bunch of grapes, I am reminded of the patience required to pick them one by one, a metaphor for the way we build a life, one small experience at a time. This painting is a tribute to the quiet, unsung moments of home life, where the simple act of looking at what is on our table becomes a way of grounding ourselves in the present.
4. What mood were you trying to evoke with this monochromatic palette?
The monochromatic palette was a deliberate choice to evoke a mood of temporal suspension. Color is inherently tied to time; the yellow of a banana tells us exactly how ripe it is, and the green of a grape suggests a specific season. By removing color, I am removing the element of decay and the "expiration date" of the subject. The mood is meant to be somber, reflective, and perhaps slightly nostalgic, like a black-and-white photograph found in an attic. It creates a distance between the viewer and the subject that allows for a more intellectual and emotional connection.
I wanted the viewer to feel a sense of heavy peace. There is a weightiness to grayscale that color often masks. Without the distraction of hue, the viewer is forced to contend with the density of the paint and the gravity of the shadows. It evokes the feeling of a rainy afternoon or the quiet before a storm—a moment where the world loses its vibrancy but gains an incredible amount of clarity. It is a mood of introspection, inviting the observer to look inward while they look at the canvas, finding resonance in the subtle transitions of gray.
5. If this painting could speak, what is the first thing it would say?
If this painting could speak, it would whisper: Be still, and see what remains when the light fades. It is a call to presence. In a world that is constantly demanding our attention, our clicks, and our opinions, this painting is a silent advocate for the power of observation. It doesn't want to sell you anything or convince you of a grand political truth; it simply wants to exist in the same space as you. Its first words would be an invitation to drop the baggage of the day and sit with the shadows for a moment.
The painting would also likely speak of the beauty in the unseen. It would point out the reflected light on the underside of the grapes, the light that shouldn't be there but is, because objects share their glow with one another. It would tell the viewer that even in the darkest corners, there is a glimmer of highlight if you wait long enough for your eyes to adjust. It is a voice of quiet confidence, suggesting that there is a profound, architectural strength in the simplest things, and that you, too, possess a core that remains even when the color of your life is stripped away.
6. How long did this piece take from the first sketch to the final brushstroke?
The physical process took approximately fifteen hours of active painting, spread over the course of a week, but the conceptual simmering took much longer. I spent several days just moving the fruit around under different lamps, watching how the shadows lengthened and shortened. The initial sketch was quick; a charcoal ghosting of the major masses to ensure the composition felt balanced. However, the layering of the grayscale was a slow, deliberate dance. Working in monochrome requires an incredible amount of precision; if a value is even 5% too light or too dark, the entire illusion of three-dimensionality collapses.
I found myself returning to the grapes over and over again, as they required the most delicate touch to ensure they didn't turn into a blob of gray. The final brushstroke is always the hardest to place. It was a tiny dab of pure white on the frontmost citrus fruit: the definitive highlight that finally made the object pop forward in space. That final second of work felt like the culmination of hours of tension. It is a process of constant refinement, of pushing the darks darker and pulling the lights lighter until the balance feels like a held breath.
7. There is a "classical" feel to the arrangement—was that a nod to old masters?
Yes, this is absolutely a conscious nod to the chiaroscuro traditions of the Old Masters, specifically the Spanish bodegón painters like Juan Sánchez Cotán and Francisco de Zurbarán. There is something profoundly spiritual about the way they treated food and everyday objects, placing them against deep, void-like backgrounds that made them seem like holy relics. I wanted to borrow that theatricality of light, the idea that even a piece of fruit can be a protagonist in a grand drama of existence.
By using a classical arrangement, I am trying to bridge the gap between the past and the present. It is a way of saying that the human eye hasn't changed in five hundred years; we are still captivated by the same play of light on a sphere. However, my nod is filtered through a modern lens, the brushwork is a bit more visible, and the texture of the canvas is allowed to speak, which brings a contemporary, tactile honesty to the work. It is a conversation across centuries, a reminder that the fundamentals of beauty; balance, contrast, and form are timeless and universal, regardless of the era in which they are captured.
8. Who are the artists (past or present) that influenced this style?
Beyond the aforementioned Spanish masters, I am deeply influenced by the Italian painter Giorgio Morandi. His lifelong dedication to painting the same dusty bottles and boxes taught me that you don't need exciting subjects to make exciting art; you only need to look deeper. His work showed me that the space between objects is just as important as the objects themselves. My use of a limited palette and the focus on the piled nature of the fruit is a direct reflection of Morandi’s philosophy of repetitive, focused looking.
In a more modern sense, I find myself influenced by the starkness of Vija Celmins. Her ability to render textures—whether it’s the surface of the moon or a sea of waves, using only the most subtle shifts in gray is a technical benchmark for me. I also look toward the tonalist movement, where the atmosphere and the "envelope" of air around the objects take precedence over the details. These artists all share a common thread: they use restraint as a tool for power. They prove that by narrowing your focus, you actually expand the emotional depth of the work, and that is what I strive for in my own practice.
9. Do you find painting in grayscale more liberating or more restrictive?
I find painting in grayscale to be incredibly liberating, though it feels like a restriction at first glance. When you remove color, you are forced to become a master of value—the lightness or darkness of a tone. Color can often be a cheat or a distraction; a bright red can hide a poorly drawn shape. In monochrome, there is nowhere to hide. You have to get the form right, the light right, and the texture right through sheer technical precision. This limitation actually frees my mind to focus entirely on the soul of the composition.
It feels like writing a poem with a limited set of words; you have to be much more intentional with the words you do use. Grayscale allows me to explore the skeleton of the visual world. It turns the painting process into a puzzle of light. I find it liberating because it allows me to speak in a universal language. Everyone understands the difference between shadow and light, regardless of their cultural background or their personal associations with specific colors. It levels the playing field and allows the pure, raw emotion of the form to take center stage without the noise of hue.
10. What do you hope this piece says about your technical skill?
I hope this piece demonstrates my ability to see beyond the surface. Technical skill is often equated with hyper-realism, but I believe true skill lies in the ability to translate the three-dimensional world into a two-dimensional space while retaining the energy of the subject. I want this piece to show that I understand the physics of light—how it wraps around a curve, how it bounces off a surface to illuminate a shadow, and how it defines the boundary between an object and the void. It is a testament to my patience and my eye for detail.
Furthermore, I hope it shows my command over edge control. In this painting, some edges are sharp and defined, while others are soft and melt into the background. This is a deliberate technical choice that directs the viewer's focus and creates a sense of atmosphere. I want the viewer to see that I am not just copying fruit, but constructing a visual experience. The visible brushstrokes are meant to show that this is a human endeavor, a record of a hand moving across a surface, trying to make sense of the world through the humble medium of paint.
11. How has your relationship with this piece changed since you completed it?
When I first finished the piece, I saw only the technical hurdles I had overcome—the struggle with the grapes, the battle to get the highlight on the banana just right. My relationship with it was one of relief and critical assessment. However, as the paint has dried and time has passed, I have begun to see the painting as a separate entity from myself. I no longer see my effort; instead, I see the soul of the arrangement. It has become a mirror for my own need for stillness.
Now, when I look at it, I feel a sense of companionship. It has become a talisman of a specific week in my life where I chose to prioritize observation over action. It reminds me that even when I feel gray or monochrome myself, there is still a structure and a beauty to that state. I’ve grown to appreciate the background more than I did initially; what I once saw as just a dark space, I now see as the necessary silence that allows the fruit to sing. It has taught me that the empty parts of our lives are often what give the full parts their meaning.
12. How does the monochromatic choice affect the "flavor" or "scent" the viewer imagines?
The monochromatic choice creates a phantom sensory experience. Because the brain isn't receiving the visual data for yellow or purple, it has to work harder to fill in the blanks. Paradoxically, this can make the imagined scent or flavor more intense because it is coming from the viewer’s own memory rather than being dictated by the artist. When you see a gray banana, you don't just think banana; you think of the idea of a banana—its specific, creamy sweetness, its slightly starchy scent.
The lack of color strips away the freshness of the fruit and turns it into something more abstract—almost like a stone carving or a fossil. This shifts the flavor from something sugary to something more "earthy" and permanent. It evokes the smell of old paper, of cold stone, or of a cellar where fruit is stored for the winter. It turns the sensory experience from one of consumption to one of "contemplation." You aren't tempted to eat this fruit; you are invited to taste its form with your eyes. It becomes a feast for the mind rather than the palate.
13. How would the meaning change if this were painted in bright, neon colors?
If this were painted in bright, neon colors, the meaning would shift from meditation to confrontation. Neon is the language of advertising, of the digital screen, and of the frantic pace of modern consumerism. It would turn these humble fruits into products. The banana would become a Pop Art icon, the grapes would look like candy, and the whole piece would scream for attention rather than waiting quietly to be noticed. It would change the work from a memento mori (a reminder of death/stillness) into a carpe diem (a shout of life/excess).
Neon colors would also flatten the form. The subtle interplay of light and shadow that gives these fruits their soul would be lost in the vibration of high-intensity hues. The emotional tone would shift from domestic prayer to urban irony. While a neon version might be more exciting in a traditional sense, it would lose the weight that defines the current work. The silence of the gray would be replaced by the static of color, and the intimacy of the domestic ritual would be replaced by the anonymity of the supermarket shelf.
14. If this piece were the cover of a book, what would the book be about?
If this painting were the cover of a book, it would be a literary novel about the unspoken lives of a family living in a quiet, coastal town. It would be a story of what happens in the silences between people—the things that aren't said at the dinner table, the small gestures of love that go unnoticed, and the way grief can settle into the furniture of a house like dust. The book would be slow-paced and deeply psychological, focusing on the beauty and the burden of the ordinary.
The title might be something like The Weight of Salt or What Remains in the Shadow. It would be a book that explores the concept of stasis—what happens when people feel stuck in their lives, yet find a strange, architectural strength in that stillness. The fruit on the cover would serve as a metaphor for the characters: grouped together by circumstance, defined by the light they cast on one another, and ultimately, existing in a world where the color has been washed away by time, leaving only the essential, beautiful truth of their forms.
0 Comments